<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KPBS Stands Out for San Diego Fire Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bracken.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/kpbs-stands-out-for-san-diego-fire-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bracken.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/kpbs-stands-out-for-san-diego-fire-coverage/</link>
	<description>John Bracken's thoughts on the media &#38; technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bracken</title>
		<link>http://bracken.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/kpbs-stands-out-for-san-diego-fire-coverage/#comment-41444</link>
		<dc:creator>bracken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bracken.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/kpbs-stands-out-for-san-diego-fire-coverage/#comment-41444</guid>
		<description>Dan-- my point, not fully articulated,perhaps, is that KBZT has no significant, if any, news presence of its own. I hear tales that in the not too distant past commercial radio stations employed journalists, they don&#039;t anymore. News departments, particularly on FM, are rare breeds in ther aftermath of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. 
I say all this without hating on KBZT which, I gather, is far from a typical Clear-channel corporate crappy station.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan&#8211; my point, not fully articulated,perhaps, is that KBZT has no significant, if any, news presence of its own. I hear tales that in the not too distant past commercial radio stations employed journalists, they don&#8217;t anymore. News departments, particularly on FM, are rare breeds in ther aftermath of the 1996 Telecommunications Act.<br />
I say all this without hating on KBZT which, I gather, is far from a typical Clear-channel corporate crappy station.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Kelley</title>
		<link>http://bracken.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/kpbs-stands-out-for-san-diego-fire-coverage/#comment-41434</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bracken.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/kpbs-stands-out-for-san-diego-fire-coverage/#comment-41434</guid>
		<description>&quot;an indictment of commercial radio’s ability to cover news&quot;????

I seriously doubt KBZT would be doing this if KPBS had not lost their transmitter.  If anything, this is an indictment of commercial radio&#039;s willingness to assist another broadcaster in need and provide a public service to the people of San Diego.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;an indictment of commercial radio’s ability to cover news&#8221;????</p>
<p>I seriously doubt KBZT would be doing this if KPBS had not lost their transmitter.  If anything, this is an indictment of commercial radio&#8217;s willingness to assist another broadcaster in need and provide a public service to the people of San Diego.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
